Thursday, November 12, 2009

NEW 30 SECONDS TO MARS VIDEO!


30 Seconds to Mars' new video, for "Kings & Queens," is now out!! It debuted at midnight tonight. It's a great visual of the song, check it out when you have a spare six minutes or so. (OK, nine minutes including credits.)


If you'd like to know more about the video, check out this article on Spinner. A good number of the bike riders are fans of the band; anyone was invited to show up for the rides.

And because I'm a dork, here are the lyrics to the song, yet again.

Into the night,
desperate and broken.
The sound of a fight,
father has spoken.

We were the kings and queens of promise.
We were the phantoms of our selves.
Maybe the children of a lesser god,
between Heaven and Hell.
Heaven and Hell.

Into your lies,
hopeless and taken.
We stole our new lives,
through blood and pain,
in defense of our dreams.
In defense of our dreams.

We were the kings and queens of promise.
We were the phantoms of our selves.
Maybe the children of a lesser god,
between Heaven and Hell.
Heaven and Hell.
Heaven and Hell.

The age of man is over.
A darkness comes and all
These lessons that we've learned here
have only just begun!

We were the kings and queens of promise.
We were the phantoms of our selves.
Maybe the children of a lesser god,
between Heaven and Hell.

We are the kings!
We are the queens!
We are the kings!
We are the queens!


Share/Save/Bookmark

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

In 2009, Louisiana has untested rape kits from 2001

Yesterday I wrote about legislation introduced recently that is meant to alleviate the backlog of rape kits in this country, and encourage states to get them tested. Here's why this is so important (source: CBS):

A five-month CBS News investigation of 24 cities and states has found more than 6,000 rape kits from active investigations waiting months, even years to be tested.

On average, six months in Rhode Island, Alabama and Illinois. It can take nearly a year in Missouri. Up to three years in Anchorage, Alaska. One state, Louisiana, has rape kits dating as far back as 2001 waiting to be tested.
And that is important because ...
Sen. Patrick Leahy says it wasn't supposed to be this way. In 2003, he co-sponsored federal legislation allocating three-quarters of a billion dollars to clear the rape kit backlog. But still delays remain. "If they don't catch the person on this rape, they are going to commit another one," Leahy said.

That's what David Lisak found. An expert on rape at the University of Massachusetts, he says research shows that 71 percent of rapists are repeat offenders.
I knew from past reports and reading on the subject that the backlog of rape kits was a problem. I did not know that some places still have rape kits from 2001 waiting to be tested.

We're talking active criminal investigations here. I want to be clear on this. A woman is raped and (is one of the few who) actually reports it, and has a rape kit done. (Not clear on what a rape kit is? It collects evidence and is done by a medical professional. Fingernail scrappings, hair, semen, mouth swabs, etc. are collected, and photos can be taken at that time too.) She reports the rape and hopes the justice system will work for her ... only to find out that the rape kit she submitted to has been sitting around in a lab for a year (or longer!) while the rapist is walking around, free. That is what is going on.

Here's a sadly perfect example, also from the CBS story:
"We had a sense that there were perpetrators out there who were not being followed up on," said Steve Redding. He's a county attorney in Minneapolis, and started digging through old cases where the victim didn't know her attacker, and for one reason or another, the kits were never tested. He sent 35 kits to the lab. Patterns emerged. A case from 1998 matched DNA from a 2007 case.

"Do I think that the person has not committed any sexual assaults in between those nine years," Redding asked? "Not in my life as a prosecutor for 30 years.

In the end, Redding got DNA matches on eight of the 35 cases, charging all eight with rapes.
Curious to know what the situation is in your city or state? Check these CBS lists of many locations. It's pretty horrific. A number of locations don't even know how many untested kits they have.

CBS has a whole series of stories about rape that were published this week. Definitely worth reading the above links and "Rape in America: Justice denied," which itself includes a number of useful links, such as FBI stats, RAINN help, date rape myths and more.

Given all this, I think it's worth picking up a phone or sending an e-mail to your representatives and urging them to pass the Justice for Survivors of Sexual Assault Act of 2009 legislation. Find contact information for your Senators here, and for your House representative here or here.


Share/Save/Bookmark

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Sen. Al Franken is up to good again

Almost a month ago, Sen. Al Franken introduced an amendment to a bill that would prevent the federal government from entering into contracts with companies who make their contractors/employees sign agreements saying they can't sue if they're raped (among other things).

Now Franken has introduced legislation, co-sponsored by Sens. Dianne Feinstein, Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch, to do something about the backlog of rape kits in this country.

The legislation -- called the Justice for Survivors of Sexual Assault Act -- sounds like a great bill, much-needed, and long overdue. According to the Minnesota Independent, the bill would:

  • Encourage states to examine untested rape kits for DNA evidence
  • Provide for more health workers trained to administer rape-kit exams, particularly for Native American women.
  • Make it so women couldn’t be made to pay for all or part of their rape kit exams (remember this Texas story?).
Each of those components are crucial on their own, let alone all together. I can't see how this legislation doesn't get passed (but I don't doubt our government's ability to disappoint me). It's exciting to see legislation that could have a meaningful impact on not just catching suspects in rape cases, but also actually helping women who have been raped. (I consider having someone who knows what they're doing when they're administering a rape kit "helpful," as well as not having to pay for the kit.)

For more information on this bill and the impact it could have, check out the Ms. Magazine article and the press release from the Human Rights Watch, which has a lot of applicable statistics in it (number of untested rape kits in L.A.? 12,500. In Detroit? 10,000) as well as more information on how decreasing the rape kit backlog would work.

You can also read the full text of the bill and track it here.

After the defense contractor legislation and this, I can't help but wonder just how powerful an ally Franken might become to women in this country, and to all citizens. Just the other day he spoke about employment discrimination and how people who are gay or transgender can be legally fired from their jobs for those reasons alone. (He even introduced legislation to require that household products list all ingredients -- how is that not being done yet??) One thing is certain: Try as they might, Republicans can't reduce Franken to a comedy act anymore.


Share/Save/Bookmark

Monday, November 9, 2009

White House won't take a position on Stupak amendment

Is it just me, or does this sound like the White House couldn't care less about anything abortion related so long as some kind of health care reform makes it to Obama's desk?



Real nice.

If you're still not sure exactly what the Stupak amendment means and why people such as myself can't stop talking about it, be sure to read RH Reality Check's summary of it here.


Share/Save/Bookmark

Sunday, November 8, 2009

These House members get it: Listen to their objections to Stupak amendment

If you need some reassurance that some members of the House do in fact understand why the Stupak amendment never should have been passed (or if you yourself don't understand why it shouldn't have been passed), watch these video clips from yesterday's hearings.

Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA09)



Rep. Nita Lowey (D-NY18)



Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT03)



Rep. Diana Degette (D-CO01)



Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY28)




Share/Save/Bookmark

Suggested Sunday reading (11/8)

Trying to stay away from health care reform and the Stupak amendment (reading list here), hoping to think about something else for a while. Not that this is all good news, but let's start with a really cute article from the Centre Daily Times: "Nameberry: Heroines, worthy women and trailblazers with notable names." The article is a list of baby name suggestions based on (mostly American) groundbreaking women. Love this concept. Any suggestions of other names that should be included here? (Pictured is Ada Lovelace, "daughter of the poet Byron whose work in mathematics was (probably) a precursor of the modern computer.")

In other reading:

  • Ms. Magazine: Swiss fund to support firms with female directors
  • Ms. Magazine: Militants close women's groups in Kenya
  • The Frisky: Real-Life “Nip/Tuck”: A Plastic Surgeon Sculpts His Perfect FrankenWife
  • RH Reality Check: The "Born Alive" Myth: Tale Turned Political Tool
  • Beautiful You: Kate Winslet: A body image warrior
  • Feministing: Teen Vogue features pregnant covergirl, moral panic ensues
  • New York Times: Op-ed by Nicholas Kristof, "Unhealthy America"
  • Slate: Everything You Always Wanted To Know About Sex (But Didn't Learn Because You Grew Up in China)
  • Broadsides: Brand X Chromosome
  • Boston Globe: Court rejects abortion clinic buffers (in Pittsburgh)
  • NYT: "Community Continues to Grapple With Rape," a story about the Richmond High gang rape. One student is quoted as saying "She got drunk one time and messed with the wrong crowd and provoked some dude and got raped, that’s it."
  • Fox News: Under the lovely "poptarts" heading, "Cover Girl Joanna Krupa Says Posing for Playboy Empowering for Women." Krupa has some strong words for women who disagree.
  • Reuters: New Edition of On The Issues Magazine: 'Race, Feminism, Our Future'
  • Huffington Post: Petru Popescu writes "Was Mary a Template for Today's Feminism?" Yes, that Mary. Interesting read, even if I'm not a believer in virgin births.
  • Chicago Tribune: Steve Trombley, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Illinois (how many men are in top roles like that in PP? Just curious), responds to the paper's editorial about parental notification law, with "Putting pregnant teens first, with or without parents."
  • The Frisky: "Why Women Should Be Concerned About Men’s Rights Groups" (Great topic, I don't know that many people are all that aware of these groups.)
  • Shakesville: Today in rape culture
  • If you missed it, last week there was a blog-a-thon, Women Blog for Health Care. Womenstake has a list of blogs to check out.

Also, I wanted to include some lighter, non-anything, just-for-fun stories:

  • Entertainment Weekly: 'Say Anything' turns 20: Cameron Crowe's crazy story behind 'In Your Eyes' and Lloyd Dobler's boom box. I learned all kinds of interesting info from this article. Like the fact that Crowe is married to Nancy Wilson of Heart!If you saw last week's episode of Mad Men (minor spoiler), you know someone on the show got married the day after JFK was assassinated.
  • The New York Times found people who actually did get married the day after: "On Nov. 23, 1963, Some People Really Did Marry"
  • This is a really cool photo blog: My Parents Were Awesome
  • On the Consumerist: Reader: "Paid My T-Mobile Bill, Saw Some Boobs"
  • Good Housekeeping has a list of the "best toys of all time." I would bet a lot of people my age (33) owned a number of these at some point. I certainly did.
  • Check out this sustainable mobile home. Pretty cool.


Share/Save/Bookmark

Suggested Sunday reading: Stupak amendment edition

I'll be adding more articles to this as I come across them, but if you have written something or read something on the subject that should be included, please let me know by e-mailing me at rosiered23@sparecandy.com. Thanks!

RH Reality Check has been on top of this amendment and the story. Check out their posts:

  • Stupak amendment passes! Affects every woman (link)
  • Historic Health Reform Bill Passes But At a Price: Women's Groups Have Mixed Reaction (link)
  • "This Is Only the First Salvo In the Bishops Campaign Against Women's Health" (link)
  • Many Dems Who Voted For Stupak Still Voted Against the Bill (link)
  • The Answer to the Stupak? Overturn Hyde Now (link)
Other articles:
  • Womenstake: A Major Advancement in Health Care Reform - Next Step Must Meet Women's Reproductive Health Care Needs
  • Open Left: Dems who voted for the Stupak amendment to restrict women's rights.
  • Open Left: Targeting Dems In 2010
  • New York Times: Abortion was at heart of wrangling
  • Alas, a Blog: Stupak amendment makes a good day bad
  • Room Eight: Rep. Jerrod Nadler's statement on Stupak passing, and transcript of his statement on the House floor.
  • Feministing: Whose health care victory?
  • Pandagon: Misogyny hijacks health care reform vote
I don't know when I'll have the energy to write my own post about this amendment, but I do want to say that while we can all be angry at Reps. Bart Stupak, a Democrat, and Joe Pitts, a Republican, for introducing this legislation, and we can be angry at the Republicans who voted for this even though they didn't vote for the health care bill, and we can be angry at the 64 Democrats who voted for this (especially the 19 who then did NOT vote in favor of the health care bill), let's not forget that it's entirely possible (if not fact) that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and others compromised women's rights and women's health by making some kind of deal to allow this amendment in order for the health care bill to pass. Let House representatives know how you feel about their vote, whatever it was, and let's focus on the Senate bill -- contact your Senators! -- and hope that, in the end, the Stupak amendment will not be part of the legislation that President Obama signs.

By the way, Planned Parenthood has a letter you can send to Obama about this.


Share/Save/Bookmark
Blog Widget by LinkWithin

  © Blogger template 'Minimalist E' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP